|
The Battle Of
Otterburn 1388
"'A Douglas!' 'A Douglas!"

The
Battle of Otterburn took place on 19 August 1388, as part of the
continuing border war between England and Scotland. Partly fought in
moonlight, it was a victory for the Scots, led by James Douglas, 2nd Earl
of Douglas over Harry Hotspur, son of the Earl of Northumberland. Douglas
was killed in the battle, though his victory added to the prestige of his
house, foremost among the border fighters of Scotland.
When the latest truce with England ended in the high
summer of 1388 the Scots began attacks on both the western and eastern
marches, taking advantage of growing divisions between the Percies and the
Nevilles, the English wardens. In August the Earl of Douglas led a
particularly bold move against the port of Newcastle. This was risky: he
was not equipped to carry out a siege; Newcastle was one of the main
muster points for English troops in the north, so it was likely there
would be more soldiers inside the town defending than outside attacking;
and with the Earl of Northumberland at Alnwick, there was always a danger
that his retreat would be cut off. But the very audacity of Douglas' move
had the effect of convincing the English that his force was only the
vanguard of a much larger army close by. Frequent skirmishes took place at
the outer defences of the western wall. In the account of Jean Froissart
Douglas is said to have captured Hotspur's own pennon, though this story
reads as if it has been added to provide some romantic colour, a technique
in which the chronicler excels.
When Hotspur woke on the morning of the 18th it was to find that his
opponent had vanished in the night. By now the deception was clear, and he
determined to set off in pursuit with all haste, before the enemy had a
chance to slip back across the border. Hotspur had at his disposal some
8000 troops and, true to his impetuous nature, he decided to set off at
once, rather than wait for reinforcements promised by John de Fordham, the
Bishop of Durham.
After leaving Newcastle Douglas moved in a
north-westerly direction, making for the valley of the River Rede,
intending to take the same route back to Scotland by which he had entered
England. He was in no particular hurry, despite the obvious dangers of his
situation. His force, of course, was weighed down with livestock and other
booty; but when he reached the tower of Ponteland, a few miles from
Newcastle, he paused to attack this unimportant obstacle, thus alerting
Hotspur to the direction of his retreat.
By the evening of the same day he reached the valley of the Rede at a
place called Otterburn. Here Douglas set up camp across the road, with his
right flank close to the river and his left stretching out on the slope
leading up to the moors, approximately one mile beyond Otterburn Tower.
Most of the following day-Wednesday 19 August-was spent in unsuccessful
assaults on the tower. With his men tired by their exertions Douglas
prepared to settle down for a second night on the banks of the Rede.
Believing himself safe from attack he did not even take the precaution of
posting sentries, an action suggesting a dangerous degree of
overconfidence. But for the outcome of what was to follow history is
likely to have passed a very different verdict on the second Earl of
Douglas.
Hotspur made good progress in his march from Newcastle,
but it is likely that he believed the enemy to be further ahead. When he
entered the valley of the Rede in the dying summer light of the 19th he
was simply looking for a place to camp: his men were tired and stretched
out in a long column reaching back to Ponteland. But there, a short
distance to the front, were the Scots. Two choices were open to him: to
wait for the morning, allowing his men to rest and regroup before
beginning the battle, thus allowing the usual English superiority in the
longbow to have its full effect; or to take the high-risk strategy of
beginning an immediate attack, hoping to gain the advantage of surprise.
Hotspur would not wait for dawn: battle would be joined at once. To
prevent the Scots slipping away he detached part of his force on a wide
sweep to the north, past the Scottish left flank and then, in the word's
of John Hardyng's Chronicle, to "holde them in that they fled not away"
while the main body of the army launched a frontal attack.
With the sudden approach of the English in the fading light there was
considerable confusion in the Scottish camp, taken by complete surprise.
The Chronicle of Pluscarden describes the scene thus;
They rose at once and rushed to arms, but
scarcely could a bare half of them arm themselves. The Earl of Douglas
also rose, and in his haste could hardly put on his armour or fasten it
with the buckles, owing to the confusion of the sudden onslaught of the
enemy; so he rushed forward with uncovered face to marshall the line of
the battle.
Gathering as many men as he could Douglas began a counter-attack that was
to win him a battle and immortality. He approached Percy's right flank to
the north, racing swiftly along a wooded hillside, with a slight
depression covering his approach for the last two hundred yards, before
falling on the astonished Englishmen by the light of the autumn moon with
loud cries of 'A Douglas!' 'A Douglas!' The ensuing battle was one of the
strangest in all the Anglo-Scottish wars. Because of the poor visibility
Percy was unable to make effective use of his archers. Each man fought in
a grim hand-to-hand contest, with only enough light to see for a short
distance around him. The spectral combat ceased whenever clouds flitted
across the face of the moon, allowing all a welcome rest in the darkness,
only to begin again with renewed vigour when the wind carried them past.
In these conditions the combat continued for several hours, amidst the
shrieks of the wounded and dying, over ground slippery with blood.
At some point during the night Earl James was killed, but by whom and in
what manner is unknown, despite Froissart's theatrical account. Andrew of
Wyntoun, the Scottish chronicler, simply says; "Bot Errl James thar was
slane, that na man whist on quhat manner." His body was found the
following morning, stripped of his armour and with a great wound in his
neck. Unaware of his death his comrades fought on, steadily pushing the
English downhill. As dawn broke Hotspur's army began to crumble, with men
fleeing the field in increasing numbers. Hotspur was taken prisoner, as
was his brother, Ralph, who had been badly wounded. Altogether over 1800
men were slain or captured. A number of Scots were also taken prisoner in
their over-hasty pursuit of the English.
When the Battle of Otterburn was being fought the Bishop of Durham was
on his way from Newcastle with 2000 cavalry and 5000 infantry. They
arrived at Ponteland on the morning of 20 August, where they met groups of
men fleeing from the battlefield, which had such a demoralising effect
that the whole force retired.
The principal cause of the English defeat is simply stated-Hotspur was a
brave soldier but a bad commander, a truth summarised by the Westminster
Chronicle;
The calamity that befell our countrymen on this
occasion of Otterburn was due in the first place to the heady spirit and
excessive boldness of Sir Henry Percy, which caused our troops to go into
battle in the disorder induced by haste: and in the second place because
the darkness played such tricks on the English that when they aimed a
careless blow at a Scotsman, owing to the chorous of voices speaking the
same language, it was an Englishman that they cut down.
When news of the defeat reached London the search for scapegoats began
immediately. The obvious candidate was the Bishop of Durham, who was
criticised by the Royal Council for arriving too late to help Hotspur.
Curiously, no official blame was attached to the commander himself for his
military incompetence. He was generally perceived as a rather heroic
figure, with King Richard and Parliament both contributing towards the
cost of his ransom.
The body of Douglas was taken back to Scotland and buried with all honour
beside that of his father at Melrose Abbey.

|